Speaker summary
ā 55%2 analyzed articles/videos51.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ipsos results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Recency Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 21 hits. Analysis detected 99 faulty-reasoning hits from 51.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ā 53% (13,517 of 28,364 speakers). This Ipsos is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Ipsos
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 53%Ipsos (selected)34%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 51.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
33.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos51.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 34.5%34.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 33.9%33.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.5%34.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.5%30.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 11.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 34.5%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos