Speaker summary
⁠70%5 analyzed articles/videos317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intel results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 408 faulty-reasoning hits from 317 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,453 of 28,364 speakers). This Intel is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Intel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.8% percentile
14.3% BS Score5 analyzed videos317 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 23.3%23.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 27.1%27.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing Effect: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos