Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Loohuis results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 481 hits . Analysis detected 3,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (6,243 of 6,362 authors). This Kim Loohuis is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Kim Loohuis
Author details
Total words: 8,648
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst