Gizmodo57%

AI Hype Delivers Intel Its Fastest Revenue Growth in 15 Years 67%

By Ece Yildirim73%

7/24/2026, 12:35:18 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 29.7% saturation with 162 hits. Analysis detected 1,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 545 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.3% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,391 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the article peer group.

The AI infrastructure buildout is so massive that it has brought a once-ailing Intel back from the dead. 
Intel is back from the dead, thanks to AI (and probably Trump). 
The chipmaker recorded its fastest revenue growth in 15 years this past quarter, driven almost entirely, it seems, by rising chip demand from AI data centers. 
In the second quarter of 2026, Intel’s revenue was up 25% from the same time last year, with a 59% increase alone from its data center and AI business, according to the company’s earnings report. 
Once America’s leading chip giant, Intel lost its crown to other chipmakers, particularly the GPU king Nvidia, and watched sales plunge. 
The situation got dire enough that the previous CEO, Pat Gelsinger, was pretty much ousted in December 2024; the new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, took over in March 2025 with promises of a major comeback; and the Trump administration stepped in with a 10% stake in August. 
Trump and his administration have reportedly been crucial in facilitating deals between Intel and Silicon Valley AI giants like SpaceX, Apple and Nvidia, further securing Intel a place in AI hype. 
Intel’s turnaround story has also coincided with a renaissance period of sorts for central processing units, aka CPUs. 
GPUs are traditionally associated with AI hype, but CPUs are more Intel’s playing field. 
As enthusiasm around agentic AI grew, CPUs have taken on a renewed role as they are largely considered well-suited for tasks that are at the core of agentic systems like inference workloads. 
“Our data center-AI group delivered a solid quarter. 
Demand accelerated across cloud and enterprise as customers increasingly recognize the critical role that CPUs in general and x86 CPUs in particular play in the AI infrastructure,” Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan said in the company’s earnings call on Thursday. 
Memory crisis continues testing PCs 
But even though the boom in its AI business seems to be serving it well, Intel’s main bread and butter is still the chips it makes for PCs. 
While revenue from the AI and data center business enjoyed a massive 59% rise, the client computing segment (recently renamed to client computing and physical AI group) had a 13% rise in revenue from the same time last year. 
PC sales and prices have been battered in the past year due to an AI-driven memory chip crisis. 
Chipmakers have largely shifted focus to address the booming demand from the massive AI data center buildout, leaving high-bandwidth memory chip supply restricted for consumer electronics like PCs and smartphones. 
With demand still high and supply limited, prices have risen for consumers while sales have suffered. 
Worldwide PC shipments had their first decline in two years this year, according to International Data Corporation research from earlier this month. 
Global smartphone shipments have also hit a record low this year due to the same culprit. 
Intel is expecting the memory shortage to continue hitting PC sales through at least the rest of the year, too. 
“We expect PC consumption to be sub-seasonal in the second half of the year, and down low double digits percent for all of 2026, impacted by rising memory prices and constraints,” Intel CFO David Zinsner said in the earnings call. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 16.1%Ece Yildirim: 4.6%Gizmodo: 4.1%Confirmation Bias16.1%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.9%Gizmodo: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Ece Yildirim: 4.1%Gizmodo: 3.1%Availability Heuristic13.6%This article: 6.4%Ece Yildirim: 1.3%Gizmodo: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic6.4%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.1%Gizmodo: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.7%Gizmodo: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.5%Ece Yildirim: 8.9%Gizmodo: 5.5%Framing Effect10.5%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.1%Ece Yildirim: 0.8%Gizmodo: 0.4%Status Quo Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Ece Yildirim: 4.8%Gizmodo: 3.9%Optimism Bias9.5%This article: 7.0%Ece Yildirim: 6.4%Gizmodo: 2.1%Pessimism Bias7.0%This article: 3.9%Ece Yildirim: 10.0%Gizmodo: 7.5%Negativity Bias3.9%This article: 7.2%Ece Yildirim: 2.9%Gizmodo: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias7.2%This article: 5.5%Ece Yildirim: 1.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error5.5%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.6%Gizmodo: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.2%Gizmodo: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Ece Yildirim: 1.2%Gizmodo: 2.9%Halo Effect4.2%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Ece Yildirim: 3.4%Gizmodo: 1.6%Recency Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.7%Ece Yildirim: 8.5%Gizmodo: 4.3%Appeal to Authority29.7%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.9%Gizmodo: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.2%Gizmodo: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.7%Ece Yildirim: 7.4%Gizmodo: 5.3%Hasty Generalization7.7%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.3%Gizmodo: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.5%Gizmodo: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 4.0%Gizmodo: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.2%Gizmodo: 1.0%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 27.9%Ece Yildirim: 7.0%Gizmodo: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)27.9%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 1.1%Gizmodo: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 5.5%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.3%Composition/Division5.5%This article: 1.5%Ece Yildirim: 2.6%Gizmodo: 2.0%Anecdotal1.5%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 2.4%Gizmodo: 2.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.2%Gizmodo: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 2.2%Ece Yildirim: 0.1%Gizmodo: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy2.2%This article: 17.6%Ece Yildirim: 2.8%Gizmodo: 4.6%Unattributed Quote17.6%This article: 1.5%Ece Yildirim: 1.1%Gizmodo: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection1.5%This article: 2.0%Ece Yildirim: 4.9%Gizmodo: 13.5%Biased Writer Voice2.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.6%Gizmodo: 1.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Ece Yildirim: 0.7%Gizmodo: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Ece Yildirim: 0.0%Gizmodo: 3.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

545 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers25%attributed speech409writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageIntel • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageLip-Bu Tan • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageInternational Data Corporation • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Zinsner • 40 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lip-Bu Tan

100%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words29% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+86.1 ptsWriter: 13.9%Lip-Bu Tan: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%Lip-Bu Tan: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.7 ptsWriter: 2.7%Lip-Bu Tan: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.0 ptsWriter: 2.0%Lip-Bu Tan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.