Keyword summary
17% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intel results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 1,263 hits . Analysis detected 13,467 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,560 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (34,460 of 35,444 keywords). This Intel is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Intel
Keyword details
Total words: 24,560
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 1.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles24.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst