Apple to work with Intel on US chip design and production, Trump says 41%

By Landon Mion77%

6/19/2026, 5:37:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 748 faulty-reasoning hits from 409 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.8% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,123 of 20,363 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.50% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump said Thursday that Apple has agreed to work with Intel on designing and producing chips in the U.S. 
"When I won my Second Term, it was clear America needed its Semiconductor Industry to come back to the U.S.A. 
We design everything, but we need to BUILD it here, NOW! 
So I decided to help Intel because we need to design and build our Chips right here in America," Trump wrote on Truth Social. 
The partnership could help Apple diversify its manufacturing base as it looks for additional chip capacity. 
The tech giant relies heavily ​on the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, which has advanced production ​lines in ​high demand from AI chipmakers such as Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices. 
APPLE CEO SAYS PRICE HIKES ARE 'UNAVOIDABLE' AS RISING CHIP COSTS SQUEEZE TECH GIANT: REPORT 
Intel shares rose in premarket trading following the announcement from the president. 
"The Technology the World relies on was invented in America. 
We all remember 'Intel Inside.' 
Stupid Presidents took our Economy for granted, and let Taiwan and others steal our Semiconductor Factories," Trump said. 
Intel reportedly reached a preliminary agreement to make some chips for Apple after more than a year of talks. 
Apple and Intel have not publicly detailed which chips or products would be involved. 
HOW YOU CAN GET A SLICE OF APPLE'S $250M IPHONE SETTLEMENT 
An Apple contract would give Intel steady demand from a top consumer electronics company after its reputation and manufacturing business fell behind TSMC in recent years. 
Earlier this week, Intel announced that a new generation of its manufacturing technology, 18A-P, had entered initial production, as the chipmaker works to meet demand for advanced processors. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
The Trump administration took a roughly 10% stake in Intel last year and announced plans to invest billions of dollars in the chipmaker to build or expand factories in the U.S. 
Trump previously said he "should have asked for more" of a stake in Intel after the value of the federal government's Intel position rose sharply. 
"When was the last time a President made America money??" 
Trump wrote on Thursday. 
The administration has been boosting efforts to secure U.S. supply chains for critical minerals and semiconductors, including by taking equity stakes in companies as part of an effort to cut reliance on China. 
Reuters contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Landon Mion: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Landon Mion: 5.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic6.6%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.1%Landon Mion: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Landon Mion: 20.0%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect11.7%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.7%Landon Mion: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.4%Landon Mion: 5.0%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias13.4%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Landon Mion: 9.5%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias4.4%This article: 5.9%Landon Mion: 4.0%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Landon Mion: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias4.4%This article: 4.4%Landon Mion: 2.7%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 19.3%Landon Mion: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias19.3%This article: 1.2%Landon Mion: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Landon Mion: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem4.4%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.5%Landon Mion: 8.2%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority9.5%This article: 2.7%Landon Mion: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma2.7%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 1.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.4%Landon Mion: 5.8%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.2%Landon Mion: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon1.2%This article: 13.2%Landon Mion: 11.1%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion13.2%This article: 10.8%Landon Mion: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question10.8%This article: 21.3%Landon Mion: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.3%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.4%Landon Mion: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.4%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 8.1%Landon Mion: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading8.1%This article: 4.4%Landon Mion: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy4.4%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.7%Landon Mion: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.7%This article: 5.9%Landon Mion: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice5.9%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Landon Mion: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Landon Mion: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.9%

409 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers36%attributed speech260writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 5 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 25 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageReuters • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
85%flagged-word coverage
144 attributed words97% of attributed speech69% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice+16.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%President Donald Trump: 16.7%16.7%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%President Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%President Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.