Speaker summary
⁠81%2 analyzed articles/videos81.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lip-Bu Tan results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 67.2% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 220.025 faulty-reasoning hits from 81.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 53.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (7,882 of 28,364 speakers). This Lip-Bu Tan is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Lip-Bu Tan
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 81.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
53.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos81.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 78.6%78.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 67.2%67.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 33.6%33.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 78.6%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 67.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos