Speaker summary
44% 9 analyzed articles/videos 558.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indira Talwani results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Confirmation Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 282 hits . Analysis detected 1,035.106 faulty-reasoning hits from 558.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,451 of 28,364 speakers). This Indira Talwani is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Indira Talwani
Speaker details
Total words: 558.667
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 9.5% BS Score9 analyzed videos558.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 39.5% 39.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 25.8% 25.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.9% 9.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Speaker 39.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst