Speaker summary
34% 41 analyzed articles/videos 620.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hezbollah results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , In-Group Bias , and Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 164 hits . Analysis detected 1,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 620.667 analyzed words across 41 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (25,429 of 26,039 speakers). This Hezbollah is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Hezbollah
Speaker details
Total words: 620.667
Content count: 41
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 4.9% BS Score41 analyzed videos620.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 33.3% 33.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Tu Quoque: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst