Speaker summary
â 57% 17 analyzed articles/videos 622.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Haley Stevens results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 146 hits . Analysis detected 1,414.17 faulty-reasoning hits from 622.667 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of â 5% (26,286 of 27,648 speakers). This Haley Stevens is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. Haley Stevens
Speaker details
Total words: 622.667
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.9% percentile 6.7% BS Score17 analyzed videos622.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst