Speaker summary
⁠46%3 analyzed articles/videos104.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Willis results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.4% saturation with 86 hits. Analysis detected 279 faulty-reasoning hits from 104.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (18,645 of 28,364 speakers). This Greg Willis is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group.
Greg Willis

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.3% percentile
21.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos104.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 52.4%52.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 31.7%31.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.1%31.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.4%13.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 52.4%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 31.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos