Speaker summary
27%12 analyzed articles/videos101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Graham Platner for Senate results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 101 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,591 of 28,364 speakers). This Graham Platner for Senate is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Graham Platner for Senate
Speaker details
Total words: 101
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
14.1% BS Score12 analyzed videos101 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often