Speaker summary
41%6 analyzed articles/videos176.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These federal prosecutors results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 60 faulty-reasoning hits from 176.5 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (14,389 of 26,848 speakers). This federal prosecutors is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
federal prosecutors
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.4% percentile
29.3% BS Score6 analyzed videos176.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate