Author summary
11%1 analyzed article/video405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jillian Kramer results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 117 hits. Analysis detected 731 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,215 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,443 of 6,498 authors). This Jillian Kramer is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group.
Jillian Kramer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
78%Jillian Kramer (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,215
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

78% percentile
025507510077.8% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 5.4%5.4%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 2.7%2.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos