Speaker summary
⁠26%4 analyzed articles/videos112.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Open Market Committee results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 112.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (23,665 of 28,364 speakers). This Federal Open Market Committee is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Federal Open Market Committee
Speaker details
Total words: 112.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
12.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos112.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos