Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Matt Peterson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and In-Group Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 255 hits . Analysis detected 637 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,634 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,297 authors). This Matt Peterson is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Matt Peterson
Author details
Total words: 1,634
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.6% 15.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 6.3% 6.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 7.3% 7.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst