Author summary
0% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Kazin results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 1,978 hits . Analysis detected 13,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,934 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,181 of 6,628 authors). This Matthew Kazin is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Matthew Kazin
Author details
Total words: 12,934
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles12.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 10.9% 10.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.8%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst