Fed’s Bowman says she’s written in 3 interest rate cuts before year-end 31%

By Matthew Kazin0% Eric Revell74%

3/20/2026, 8:38:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 133 faulty-reasoning hits from 472 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.5% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,180 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.40% of the article peer group.

Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said on Friday that she’s penciled in multiple rate cuts before the end of the year. 
"I'm still concerned about the job market," Bowman, considered one of the more hawkish members of the Federal Open Market Committee, said during an interview on FOX Business Network's "Mornings with Maria." 
I want to see a little bit of recovery there. 
But, of course, I've written three cuts in for before the end of 2026 to hopefully support the labor market." 
Bowman also said she expects to continue to see strong economic growth this year. 
Her comments come after the FOMC on Wednesday voted 11-1 to leave the benchmark federal funds rate unchanged at a range of 3.5% to 3.75%. 
It marked the second straight meeting with rates being held steady after three successive 25-basis-point cuts in September, October and December to end last year. 
Policymakers also released a summary of economic projections (SEP), which showed that the median projection for interest rates sees just one 25 basis point cut the rest of this year followed by a single cut of that size in 2027. 
"In our SEP, FOMC participants wrote down their individual assessments of an appropriate path for the federal funds rate under what each participant judges to be the most likely scenario for the economy," Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said. 
"The median participant projects that the appropriate level of the federal funds rate will be 3.4% at the end of this year and 3.1% at the end of next year, unchanged from December." 
During the press conference following the Fed’s interest rate decision, Powell was asked what officials were seeing that led them to project a cut despite higher forecasts for both inflation and unchanged projections for the unemployment rate and economic growth. 
"Essentially, the forecast is that we will be making some progress on inflation, not as much as we had hoped, but some progress on inflation," Powell said. 
"It should come as we start to see in the middle of the year progress on tariffs going through once and then tariff inflation coming down. 
We should be seeing that." 
The latest rate decision comes amid a softening labor market and growing uncertainty over the war in Iran. 
Similar to Powell, Bowman said it’s too soon to know how the conflict in the Middle East will affect the U.S. economy. 
"I think it's too early to tell what the longer-term imprint will be on U.S. economic activity and how we should think about that in terms of our longer-term economic forecast and how we should think about that in terms of our FOMC meetings and any rate changes that we might make as a result of economic evolution going forward." 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 10.9%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Matthew Kazin: 15.3%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.8%Matthew Kazin: 14.2%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Matthew Kazin: 4.1%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 6.3%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 11.8%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 2.7%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 5.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Kazin: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

472 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.