Speaker summary
41% 91 analyzed articles/videos 1,568.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FBI results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 291.253 hits . Analysis detected 2,629.048 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,568.667 analyzed words across 91 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,615 of 26,862 speakers). This FBI is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group. FBI
Speaker details
Total words: 1,568.667
Content count: 91
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.9% percentile 3.4% BS Score91 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 7/21/2026, 10:00:00 PM