Speaker summary
35% 22 analyzed articles/videos 1,472.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esmail Baghaei results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 219 hits . Analysis detected 2,053.021 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,472.333 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,061 of 28,364 speakers). This Esmail Baghaei is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. Esmail Baghaei
Speaker details
Total words: 1,472.333
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score22 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst