Trump says US will blockade Iran in the Strait of Hormuz and will charge ships for safe passage 20%

By Associated Press60%

7/13/2026, 11:16:22 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Unattributed Quote, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 1,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,018 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of 20% (16,618 of 20,541 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the article peer group.

By JON GAMBRELL 
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP)  U.S. 
President Donald Trump said Monday that the United States is “reinstating” a blockade on Iran in the Strait of Hormuz and will charge other ships for safe passage. 
Iran has insisted it controls the critical waterway, as another exchange of fire threatened a return to all-out war. 
The U.S. had until now said the strait should remain open to all without tolls, as it was before the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran on Feb. 
28. 
Any attempt by the U.S. or Iran to charge fees would violate global norms on freedom of navigation and raise tensions, likely causing further economic disruption far beyond the region. 
Exchanges of fire in recent days, sparked by Iranian attacks on ships, had already cast further doubt on the interim peace deal reached last month. 
Washington lifted a blockade it imposed in mid-April as part of that deal, which also called for the strait to be fully reopened. 
“We are reinstating the THE IRANIAN BLOCKADE,” Trump said on social media. 
“All other countries will have fair and open use of the Strait.” 
The president said the U.S. would be “reimbursed” by 20% of the value of cargo to help cover “any and all costs necessary to do the job of providing safety and security.” 
Iran asserts it has the right to manage traffic through the strait and potentially charge fees in accordance with the interim peace deal. 
It has vowed to fight back against any U.S. interference. 
The International Maritime Organization, the United Nations agency overseeing international shipping, said it was waiting to find out more about Trump’s proposal but remained opposed to tolls for passage through international waterways. 
“There is no legal basis through which to introduce mandatory tolls simply to transit through a strait,” it said in a statement. 
The fifth of the world’s oil and gas passed through the strait before Iran effectively shut it down at the start of the war, driving up global prices of energy, fertilizer and other goods. 
Traffic had picked up after last month's agreement, but remained well below prewar levels. 
The U.S. military said it struck dozens of sites on Monday in response to an Iranian attack on a container ship the day before, including air defense systems, radar sites, missile and drone equipment, and small boats. 
It said it used drone ships to hit an Iranian ship maintenance facility and submarine on Sunday, calling it a first. 
The American military has tried to establish a route through the strait along the coast of Oman that would be outside of Iranian control. 
Iran has attacked ships using that route, saying the U.S. is violating the interim peace deal. 
The U.S. has attacked Iran in response, drawing Iranian attacks on U.S.-allied Arab states. 
The U.S. also ended waivers allowing Iran to sell crude oil on the open market in U.S. dollars. 
The struggle over the strait is escalating 
Meeting with Gulf leaders late last month, Secretary of State Marco Rubio had spoken forcefully against Iran charging fees for transit through the strait. 
“That’s international waterway. 
There isn’t a nation on Earth that supports having to pay money to go through the Straits,” Rubio told reporters in Bahrain on June 25. 
Rubio also said there was “zero support among the Gulf countries for any sort of toll or fees or anything that charges for the use of international waters. 
The president’s made it clear that’s not going to happen.” 
U.S.-allied Arab states report another wave of attacks 
Missile alert sirens sounded three times Monday in Bahrain, home to the U.S. 
Navy’s 5th Fleet. 
There was no immediate word on damage. 
Separately, Kuwait's Foreign Ministry said its consulate in Iraq had been attacked. 
It did not immediately blame anyone for the attack or disclose damages or casualties. 
The oil-rich kingdom also condemned Iran and “its factions and militias loyal to it in Iraq” for attacking what it described as “several border points” and a maritime oil drilling platform that belonged to the Kuwait Petroleum Corporation. 
Kuwait and Washington share strong ties, and the tiny country along the Persian Gulf hosts several U.S. military bases. 
In Jordan, the kingdom's military said it shot down four Iranian missiles in an incident that “resulted in zero casualties or material damage.” 
Jordan also hosts U.S. military forces and aircraft. 
In Iran, authorities reported attacks in Hormozgan, Khuzestan and Markazi provinces and said at least two people were killed, according to state-run IRNA news agency. 
Semiofficial Iranian media also reported strikes in the eastern Sistan and Baluchestan province, which is on a coast of the Gulf of Oman. 
Iran blames the US for the chaos in the region 
The attacks on Iran continued hours after the U.S. ended its strikes  again raising the possibility of Gulf Arab states retaliating. 
There were unclaimed attacks on Iran on Thursday. 
A base belonging to the armed wing of an Iranian Kurdish opposition group based in Iraq’s semiautonomous Kurdish region came under drone attack on Monday, according to Rebaz Sharifi, a local commander. 
There were no immediate details on casualties or damage. 
No group immediately claimed responsibility. 
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei blamed Washington for the chaos gripping the region. 
He said Iran wouldn't agree to visits by the International Atomic Energy Agency to nuclear sites the U.S. bombed in 2025. 
That's where Tehran's stockpile of highly enriched uranium is believed to be entombed. 
Trump suggested last week that the interim deal in the war was “over.” 
But mediators, including Pakistan, Qatar and Egypt, have continued efforts to reach a final agreement to end the war. 
Iran and the U.S. are nearly halfway through the 60-day period in which they were supposed to negotiate such an agreement, which was also supposed to address Iran's disputed nuclear program. 
Boak reported from Washington. 
Associated Press writers Konstantin Toropin in Washington, Kareem Chehayeb in Beirut, Munir Ahmed in Islamabad and Stella Martany in Irbil, Iraq, contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Associated Press: 2.2%Orlando Sentinel: 3.1%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Associated Press: 3.1%Orlando Sentinel: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.5%This article: 3.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.5%Hindsight Bias3.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Associated Press: 7.3%Orlando Sentinel: 3.6%Framing Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Associated Press: 2.0%Orlando Sentinel: 2.0%Optimism Bias1.9%This article: 5.1%Associated Press: 1.4%Orlando Sentinel: 1.3%Pessimism Bias5.1%This article: 19.4%Associated Press: 8.8%Orlando Sentinel: 8.6%Negativity Bias19.4%This article: 5.5%Associated Press: 2.1%Orlando Sentinel: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias2.9%This article: 3.7%Associated Press: 1.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.9%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 5.2%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.2%This article: 1.9%Associated Press: 2.5%Orlando Sentinel: 6.3%Halo Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.8%Associated Press: 1.5%Orlando Sentinel: 0.8%Recency Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Orlando Sentinel: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.3%Associated Press: 3.5%Orlando Sentinel: 2.6%Appeal to Authority5.3%This article: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Orlando Sentinel: 1.2%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 2.9%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.2%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%Associated Press: 2.7%Orlando Sentinel: 3.7%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Red Herring1.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.3%Associated Press: 4.6%Orlando Sentinel: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion1.3%This article: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.6%Orlando Sentinel: 0.6%Begging the Question0.3%This article: 12.3%Associated Press: 2.3%Orlando Sentinel: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.3%This article: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.4%Tu Quoque1.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%Orlando Sentinel: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.5%Associated Press: 1.3%Orlando Sentinel: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.9%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Middle Ground1.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Orlando Sentinel: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.1%Associated Press: 1.3%Orlando Sentinel: 1.0%Unattributed Quote11.1%This article: 3.9%Associated Press: 1.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection3.9%This article: 1.0%Associated Press: 3.0%Orlando Sentinel: 7.3%Biased Writer Voice1.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Orlando Sentinel: 2.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Orlando Sentinel: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Orlando Sentinel: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Orlando Sentinel: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1018 words analyzed.

Speakers

10speakers40%attributed speech606writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageInternational Maritime Organization • 32 words • 0.0% coverageInternational Maritime Organization • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. military • 37 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. military • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 25 words • 100.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageKuwait's Foreign Ministry • 12 words • 0.0% coverageKuwait's Foreign Ministry • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKuwait • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJordan's military • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageIRNA news agency • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageRebaz Sharifi • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageEsmail Baghaei • 14 words • 0.0% coverageEsmail Baghaei • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marco Rubio

100%flagged-word coverage
56 attributed words14% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%47.5%95.0%Unattributed Quote+94.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marco Rubio: 94.6%94.6%Biased Writer Voice-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.