Speaker summary
51% 13 analyzed articles/videos 832.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Esmaeil Baqaei results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 177 hits . Analysis detected 1,860.926 faulty-reasoning hits from 832.333 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,969 of 26,891 speakers). This Esmaeil Baqaei is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Esmaeil Baqaei
Speaker details
Total words: 832.333
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score13 analyzed videos832.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Special Pleading: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.3% Straw Man: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst