Speaker summary
40% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,290 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Thomas results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 213 hits . Analysis detected 969.315 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,290 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,307 of 28,364 speakers). This Eric Thomas is better (less manipulative) than 99.80% of the peer group. Eric Thomas
Speaker details
Total words: 2,290
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed videos2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst