Asking Eric: Niece bars aunt’s boyfriend from wedding 22%

By R. Eric Thomas32%

7/13/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.8% saturation with 209 hits. Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 842 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,148 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the article peer group.

Dear Eric: My niece, age 31, is getting married in the fall and has told me that I can’t bring my boyfriend (“S”) of five years because there isn’t “room.” 
I offered to pay for his meals, extra seating, et cetera, but she will not budge. 
I found out that the real reason is that she hasn’t met him and they only want people they know at the wedding. 
Earlier in the year (before the engagement), I mentioned that we would like to come out to California, so my nieces and their partners could meet S. 
Well, their schedules were too busy for us to find a date. 
These are my brother’s children, and my brother died unexpectedly in 2021, and my parents have also passed, so I am the only living relative on their father’s side. 
I have always been close to my nieces, and I have spent a lot of money on them over the years, which I don’t regret. 
I poured my heart out, saying that the wedding would be a tough day for me because I would be thinking about my brother/her father a lot, along with my parents being gone. 
I told her that I needed S by my side. 
I will be the only paternal person attending, while their mother’s side will have more than 20 people  aunts, uncles, cousins and grandparents. 
I am very hurt by this decision and have decided not to go to the wedding. 
Is there any way to change her mind? 
I understand both of our actions have consequences, but why can’t she see how much this is hurting me? 
I also mentioned that she is probably inviting people that she won’t even keep in touch with in five years, but this is your aunt’s partner, and he is a very important part of my life. 
 No Room at the Wedding 
Dear Wedding: Guest lists are often a source of consternation with marrying couples often struggling to balance their needs, wants and financial position with the needs and wants of their friends and families. 
What can seem like a very important line in the sand might later fade into a non-issue. 
While your niece’s desire to have only people she knows at her wedding is completely understandable, having your partner there really isn’t likely to impact her day one way or the other. 
I wish she was able to be a bit more flexible about this. 
That said, I think you’ll regret not going to the wedding and it might be helpful to reconsider your decision. 
You can still bring S on the trip and plan with him to meet up elsewhere before, after or even during the reception so that he can support you. 
But you may fracture your relationship with your niece if you decline to attend, which could compound the grief you’re already feeling about her father’s death. 
Weddings bring out heightened emotions. 
We rarely get it completely right. 
By going, you give yourself the gift of being present for something your brother surely would have wanted to see. 
Dear Eric: A new friend has developed a habit I don’t love, but I don’t know how to politely discourage her from doing it. 
I invite her to meet me somewhere for games and happy hour, casual but planned. 
Without asking, she texts back that she’s invited others that will join us. 
This tends to work out fine, yet I’m still rankled that she invited others to what had been my invitation to her. 
Is there something I can say that’s polite yet able to get my point across, or do I not have a point? 
 Please Stop Inviting the Uninvited 
Dear Uninvited: Next time, you might have to be proactive about communicating your expectations by saying something like, “I’d love to go out for happy hour, but let’s just keep it the two of us.” 
She might ask why, which gives you the opportunity to talk about being more comfortable with plans that don’t have a ballooning guest list. 
You can also bring it up on the next outing that’s just the two of you. 
Point out, in a non-judgmental manner, the pattern you’re noticing and express your desire to operate a different way. 
She may not think anything of inviting other people. 
She may also share that she would rather hang out in groups, which would give you the opportunity to ask why. 
Ideally, you’ll both see where the other is coming from. 
This friendship is new so you’re both still learning each other’s habits. 
By reflecting your experience back to her and offering an alternative, you keep the focus on a shared objective in your friendship rather than chastising her. 
This will help this new friendship to grow into a lasting one. 
(Send questions to R. 
Eric Thomas at eric@askingeric.com or P.O. 
Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. 
Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at rericthomas.com.) 
©2026 Tribune Content Agency, LLC. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 3.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%R. Eric Thomas: 2.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Availability Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.3%R. Eric Thomas: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias4.3%This article: 1.4%R. Eric Thomas: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%R. Eric Thomas: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%R. Eric Thomas: 2.8%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias13.3%This article: 6.5%R. Eric Thomas: 1.9%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 18.9%R. Eric Thomas: 5.8%newyorkdailynews: 9.8%Negativity Bias18.9%This article: 8.9%R. Eric Thomas: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias8.9%This article: 3.8%R. Eric Thomas: 3.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error3.8%This article: 2.3%R. Eric Thomas: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%R. Eric Thomas: 1.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.1%R. Eric Thomas: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma9.1%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.9%R. Eric Thomas: 4.3%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization10.9%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 24.8%R. Eric Thomas: 3.2%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion24.8%This article: 2.4%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 1.4%R. Eric Thomas: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.4%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof1.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.9%R. Eric Thomas: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division2.9%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 3.8%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity3.8%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.6%R. Eric Thomas: 1.7%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote8.6%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 13.7%R. Eric Thomas: 2.4%newyorkdailynews: 6.7%Biased Writer Voice13.7%This article: 8.3%R. Eric Thomas: 7.0%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination8.3%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%R. Eric Thomas: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.5%

842 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.