Topic summary
⁠22%1 analyzed article/video837 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wedding Etiquette results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 681 hits. Analysis detected 3,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,840 of 16,562 topics). This Wedding Etiquette is better (less manipulative) than 83.60% of the peer group.
Wedding Etiquette
Topic details
Total words: 6,716
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510016.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.2%0.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos