Asking Eric: Sister’s death leaves questions for family 28%

By R Eric Thomas26%

7/17/2026, 3:00:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 120 hits. Analysis detected 1,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 845 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (15,828 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the article peer group.

Dear Eric: My sister passed away without a will or trust. 
Our sister-in-law told me that my sister told her that she wanted all her things sold and divided up and given to the niece and nephews. 
My sister never told me anything. 
There is a good amount of money now to divide up. 
I am the personal representative and would like to know what is fair. 
By law the money goes to my brother and myself. 
I haven’t clarified exactly how the money was supposed to be divided but I have two children and my brother has two children. 
His two children have had children. 
They have 14 total children now. 
My brother and I are far apart in age, he married young and I married in my late 20s. 
My children have not married yet and started families. 
So, I feel it is fair to give to the first generation nephews and niece only. 
That way it’s not a 14 to 2 ratio, my brother’s side to my side. 
Part of that 14 are babies. 
The first generation can give to their families as they see fit. 
Am I being fair? 
 Fair Inheritance 
Dear Fair: This sounds reasonable. 
If you haven’t already, consult with an estate lawyer to ensure you’ve done everything you need to do when an estate is in probate. 
If you’re free and clear, what may be cleanest is following the law and giving your brother his share and telling him about the wishes your sister-in-law communicated to you. 
His side of the family can then use their judgment to figure out the best way to honor your sister. 
Dear Eric: I don’t like to visit my fiancé’s family with him because they don’t talk to me when I’m around them, and they don’t ask me anything about me. 
They only want to talk about themselves and that is ALL they talk about. 
I have tried to make an effort on multiple occasions with them, and I have made sure I’m friendly, approachable, polite, and I show an interest in their lives and ask how they are. 
They have never reciprocated the conversation and quickly change the subject to bring it back to them. 
So, I’ve stopped talking to them, and I’ve stopped going with my fiancé to see them. 
I am not used to being around people that behave this way. 
My family were extremely welcoming and generous to everyone who visited. 
I am like that, and I surround myself with people who hold a mutual conversation and are as interested in me as I am in them. 
Why are they like this? 
Is there something mentally wrong with people who just want to talk about themselves? 
It’s sad. 
But they’re so rude it hurts my feelings. 
 Unwelcome Guest 
Dear Guest: This is a tough position to be in. 
I empathize with how isolating it must feel to be around your fiancé’s family members and yet still be treated as an outsider. 
The first part of this advice might seem like a cold comfort, but I hope you’ll give it some consideration. 
It’s possible that these folks just aren’t adept at hospitality or are awkward conversationalists. 
This doesn’t make everything OK, but what’s coming across as rude and hurtful to you may not be intentional exclusion. 
You write that your family is quite different, so you  reasonably  have an expectation that others will make strides to welcome and include a guest. 
Your fiancé’s family members may not have the same expectation of themselves. 
They may not even realize that they’re doing what they’re doing. 
So, try asking your fiancé about it. 
You can share what you’ve experienced and how you’ve felt and ask him if he’s noticed it, too. 
This doesn’t necessarily need to be presented as a problem he has to fix, but he might be able to help grease the conversational wheels, either by making sure to include you more or by talking to his relatives one-on-one. 
He might even be able to give you insight about the ways certain family members talk or act, which can help you feel more like an insider and better set you up for future visits. 
Dear Eric: I’m responding to “Flummoxed” who said that a friend invited over to the house insists on washing dishes after the meal but doesn‘t wash them well. 
All efforts to convince her to please leave the dishes alone failed. 
Perhaps the hosting couple could consider using really nice, disposable dishes, silverware and plastic glasses. 
That way, no one‘s dishes get broken or poorly washed, and the guest can relax and enjoy herself. 
 No More Dirty Dishes 
Dear Dishes: This is a graceful solution that avoids awkward conversations and allows the hosts to extend their hospitality without worrying. 
Thanks. 
(Send questions to R. 
Eric Thomas at eric@askingeric.com or P.O. 
Box 22474, Philadelphia, PA 19110. 
Follow him on Instagram and sign up for his weekly newsletter at rericthomas.com.) 
©2026 Tribune Content Agency, LLC. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.2%R Eric Thomas: 2.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Confirmation Bias3.2%This article: 2.5%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Anchoring Bias2.5%This article: 1.4%R Eric Thomas: 2.8%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Availability Heuristic1.4%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 2.9%Baltimore Sun: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%R Eric Thomas: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.6%R Eric Thomas: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 1.4%R Eric Thomas: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect1.4%This article: 14.0%R Eric Thomas: 2.9%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Optimism Bias14.0%This article: 2.4%R Eric Thomas: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Pessimism Bias2.4%This article: 14.2%R Eric Thomas: 6.2%Baltimore Sun: 5.2%Negativity Bias14.2%This article: 9.0%R Eric Thomas: 2.3%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias9.0%This article: 5.3%R Eric Thomas: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%R Eric Thomas: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%In-Group Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%R Eric Thomas: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 3.4%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%R Eric Thomas: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Ad Hominem1.7%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Appeal to Authority4.0%This article: 1.9%R Eric Thomas: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.6%False Dilemma1.9%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.9%R Eric Thomas: 6.0%Baltimore Sun: 3.6%Hasty Generalization8.9%This article: 3.6%R Eric Thomas: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring3.6%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.0%R Eric Thomas: 2.5%Baltimore Sun: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion7.0%This article: 3.2%R Eric Thomas: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Begging the Question3.2%This article: 8.2%R Eric Thomas: 1.3%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.2%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.4%R Eric Thomas: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.4%This article: 1.4%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature1.4%This article: 3.1%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Composition/Division3.1%This article: 7.8%R Eric Thomas: 4.1%Baltimore Sun: 2.2%Anecdotal7.8%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.3%R Eric Thomas: 1.7%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.7%R Eric Thomas: 1.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Middle Ground4.7%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.4%R Eric Thomas: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Unattributed Quote6.4%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.6%R Eric Thomas: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.6%This article: 5.8%R Eric Thomas: 8.2%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Indoctrination5.8%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%R Eric Thomas: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%R Eric Thomas: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 4.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.5%

845 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers3.4%attributed speech816writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageR. Eric Thomas • 6 words • 0.0% coverageR. Eric Thomas • 5 words • 0.0% coverageR. Eric Thomas • 13 words • 100.0% coverageTribune Content Agency, LLC • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

R. Eric Thomas

54%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words83% of attributed speech80% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +54.2 ptsWriter: 0.0%R. Eric Thomas: 54.2%54.2%Unattributed Quote-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-0.6 ptsWriter: 0.6%R. Eric Thomas: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.