Author summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Thomas results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Optimism Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 226 hits . Analysis detected 1,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,544 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,768 of 6,628 authors). This Eric Thomas is worse (more manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Eric Thomas
Author details
Total words: 2,544
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.2% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.9%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst