Speaker summary
58% 9 analyzed articles/videos 435.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eric Schmitt results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 249 hits . Analysis detected 1,447.024 faulty-reasoning hits from 435.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (24,884 of 28,203 speakers). This Eric Schmitt is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Eric Schmitt
Speaker details
Total words: 435.667
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 10.2% BS Score9 analyzed videos435.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 32.7% 32.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 19.0% 19.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 24.1% 24.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 28.4% 28.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% In-Group Bias: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst