Speaker summary
66% 39 analyzed articles/videos 1,792 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Warren results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 394.936 hits . Analysis detected 3,456.102 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,792 analyzed words across 39 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,877 of 28,364 speakers). This Elizabeth Warren is better (less manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group. Elizabeth Warren
Speaker details
Total words: 1,792
Article count: 39
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.7% percentile 4.3% BS Score39 analyzed videos1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 22.0% 22.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst