Speaker summary
51%5 analyzed articles/videos265.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Delcy Rodriguez results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 29.1% saturation with 87.953 hits. Analysis detected 513.043 faulty-reasoning hits from 265.333 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (24,243 of 28,364 speakers). This Delcy Rodriguez is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
11.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos265.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.1%29.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.7%7.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.9%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate