Author summary
48% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,080 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoe Hussain results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,869 hits . Analysis detected 11,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,718 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,623 of 6,323 authors). This Zoe Hussain is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. Zoe Hussain
Author details
Total words: 10,718
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst