Speaker summary
⁠65%4 analyzed articles/videos79.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Schweikert results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Loss Aversion, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 295 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (15,483 of 28,364 speakers). This David Schweikert is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
David Schweikert
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.4% percentile
28.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos79.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 78.1%78.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 41.8%41.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.5%27.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 13.7%13.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 78.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 41.8%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos