Speaker summary
ā 42%3 analyzed articles/videos96.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Cameron results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 375 faulty-reasoning hits from 96.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of ā 24% (28,843 of 37,897 speakers). This David Cameron is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
David Cameron
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Conor Heffernan1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 24%David Cameron (selected)16%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%2035 Initiative100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
ā 100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 96.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
15.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos96.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Politically Left Leaning ā€¦Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Fundamental Attribution Eā€¦Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 20.9%20.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos