Author summary
69%5 analyzed articles/videos8,755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kit Klarenberg results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 6,605 hits. Analysis detected 35,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,020 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 44% (4,701 of 8,281 authors). This Kit Klarenberg is better (less manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group.
Kit Klarenberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
44%Kit Klarenberg (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 35,020
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles35K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 18.9%18.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 13.6%13.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 13.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate