Author summary
96%1 analyzed article/video1,628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Littlefair results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 1,456 hits. Analysis detected 7,141 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,043 of 6,359 authors). This David Littlefair is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
David Littlefair
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
68%David Littlefair (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,884
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 29.8%29.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.7%12.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.6%6.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 29.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Straw Man: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Horn Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos