Speaker summary
48% 23 analyzed articles/videos 1,174 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Lurie results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 238.972 hits . Analysis detected 2,105.314 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,174 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,848 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Lurie is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Daniel Lurie
Speaker details
Total words: 1,174
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.4% BS Score23 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst