Author summary
15% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kevin Truong results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,141 hits . Analysis detected 5,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,039 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,673 of 6,628 authors). This Kevin Truong is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Kevin Truong
Author details
Total words: 10,039
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst