Speaker summary
28%7 analyzed articles/videos173.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleveland Clinic results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Status Quo Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42.2% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 199 faulty-reasoning hits from 173.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of 23% (21,858 of 28,364 speakers). This Cleveland Clinic is better (less manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Cleveland Clinic

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510022.9% percentile
15.3% BS Score7 analyzed videos173.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate