Man given 54 doses of antivenom to survive rattlesnake bite in California 13%

By Owen Scott0%

7/10/2026, 6:00:18 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Pessimism Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 73 hits. Analysis detected 479 faulty-reasoning hits from 475 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,150 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the article peer group.

A California hospital ran out of antivenom after a man, who would eventually require 54 doses across two separate facilities, was bitten by a rattlesnake . 
​Idaho-based Chris Howarth was checking the waterline at his parents’ home in Oroville, Northern California , when he was attacked by the reptile. 
The snake bit him twice, he told SFGATE , with one bite reaching a vein during the May 26 attack.​ 
Chris, a father of three, told Action News Now that his wife, Jenny, thought he was joking when he raced inside and said that a western rattlesnake had attacked him. 
Meanwhile, his children were “freaking” out, shouting: “Dad’s gonna die!”​ 
Jenny raced him to Oroville Hospital, but, by the time they arrived, Chris was already feeling the effects of the venom. 
Chris was suffering from a numb tongue, swollen lymph nodes and difficulty breathing. 
According to Jenny, the snake's venom had gone straight into his bloodstream.  
A California man used up 54 vials of antivenom after being bitten by a rattlesnake. 
He told one outlet that he was bitten by a 'western rattlesnake,' otherwise known as a northern Pacific rattlesnake (stock image) ( Alan Schmierer/Wiki Commons ) 
Within an hour of arriving, he was given antivenom . 
However, on his third day in hospital, Chris developed a condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation. 
According to the Cleveland Clinic , the condition causes a patient’s body to develop more blood clots than it needs, blocking blood vessels. 
As a patient’s platelets and clotting factor run out, the body is left with no way with which to control bleeding. 
Chris was given platelets to manage the condition, but, by his sixth day in hospital, the facility had run out of antivenom. 
​At one point, Chris began writing letters to his children “to make sure they had one last letter from Dad.”​ 
Eventually, Chris was helicoptered to Stanford Medical Center after using up Oroville Hospital’s supply of antivenom, according to a GoFundMe campaign launched to support his family. 
Chris was bitten twice with one bite going through a vein. 
His wife said that the venom went straight into his bloodstream ( GoFundMe ) 
Chris received 18 doses of antivenom during his stay at the Stanford facility, the campaign page says. 
Those doses were in addition to the 36 doses he had received at Oroville Hospital. 
While being treated, he also received “Cryo (sic), platelet and plasma transfusions” and underwent CT scans. 
​After 12 days in the hospital, Chris is at home with his family, the page says. 
However, he will be unable to work for an “unknown amount of time.” 
According to National Capital Poison Center , rattlesnakes are the most venomous domestic snakes in the United States. 
Most bites require hospitalization and antivenom treatment.  
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 3.2%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Owen Scott: 5.5%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect2.5%This article: 4.6%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion4.6%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect5.5%This article: 3.4%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 6.9%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias6.9%This article: 2.1%Owen Scott: 8.4%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.4%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.1%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.2%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.8%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.7%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 2.9%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.1%Owen Scott: 4.4%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority14.1%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.7%Owen Scott: 2.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization1.7%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.4%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.3%Owen Scott: 5.9%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Owen Scott: 3.2%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.4%Owen Scott: 1.4%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal12.4%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Owen Scott: 1.8%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.4%Owen Scott: 2.5%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote15.4%This article: 2.1%Owen Scott: 2.8%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 2.9%Owen Scott: 3.1%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice2.9%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Owen Scott: 0.2%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Owen Scott: 1.3%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.5%

475 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers40%attributed speech287writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageChris Howarth • 20 words • 100.0% coverageChris Howarth • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageJenny • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJenny • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageCleveland Clinic • 23 words • 0.0% coverageCleveland Clinic • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageChris Howarth • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJenny • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageNational Capital Poison Center • 18 words • 0.0% coverageNational Capital Poison Center • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
26 attributed words14% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-18.5 ptsWriter: 18.5%National Capital Poison Center: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -9.1 ptsWriter: 9.1%National Capital Poison Center: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%National Capital Poison Center: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.