Speaker summary
39%5 analyzed articles/videos383.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleo Fields results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Emotion, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 317.317 faulty-reasoning hits from 383.5 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,354 of 28,364 speakers). This Cleo Fields is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751003.6% percentile
5.8% BS Score5 analyzed videos383.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.6%7.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate