Speaker summary
73% 8 analyzed articles/videos 1,200.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Menefee results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 254.947 hits . Analysis detected 2,896.24 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200.667 analyzed words across 8 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,573 of 28,364 speakers). This Christian Menefee is better (less manipulative) than 97.20% of the peer group. Christian Menefee
Speaker details
Total words: 1,200.667
Content count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.8% percentile 5.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.2% 15.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst