Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Staff Writers results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 2,026 hits . Analysis detected 16,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,026 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (6,016 of 6,244 authors). This Staff Writers is better (less manipulative) than 96.30% of the peer group. Staff Writers
Author details
Total words: 31,026
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles31K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst