Speaker summary
73% 13 analyzed articles/videos 655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Wright results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 33.8% saturation with 281.044 hits . Analysis detected 1,445.655 faulty-reasoning hits from 655 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (24,520 of 26,155 speakers). This Chris Wright is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group. Chris Wright
Speaker details
Total words: 655
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.3% percentile 7.5% BS Score13 analyzed videos655 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 33.8% 33.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 30.0% 30.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.4% 9.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Straw Man: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst