Speaker summary
⁠67%5 analyzed articles/videos175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Hayes results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 72 hits. Analysis detected 547.24 faulty-reasoning hits from 175 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,234 of 28,364 speakers). This Chris Hayes is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Chris Hayes
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
14.6% BS Score5 analyzed videos175 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 18.3%18.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 16.7%16.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 0.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos