Speaker summary
59% 6 analyzed articles/videos 393.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Coons results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 145.803 hits . Analysis detected 824.31 faulty-reasoning hits from 393.667 analyzed words across 6 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (25,458 of 27,641 speakers). This Chris Coons is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group. Chris Coons
Speaker details
Total words: 393.667
Content count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.9% percentile 8.3% BS Score6 analyzed videos393.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 30.1% 30.1% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 11.3% 11.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Tu Quoque: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 0.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Middle Ground: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst