Blanche confronts skeptical questioning of fund, tax deal for Trump at Senate confirmation hearing 32%

By ERIC TUCKER35% ALANNA DURKIN RICHER47%

7/15/2026, 11:11:41 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 547 hits. Analysis detected 1,900 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,247 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.8% and a BS Rank of 32% (15,030 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche confronted skeptical questions at a Senate confirmation hearing Wednesday about the creation of a fund to compensate President Donald Trump's allies and a tax immunity deal for the president as he aimed to lock down the Republican support needed to advance his nomination. 
Blanche insisted that the $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund," which was scrapped after fierce bipartisan backlash, was "not moving forward." 
But lawmakers, including Republican Sen. 
John Cornyn, conveyed concerns that the Trump administration has yet to commit in writing that the fund is dead and could therefore conceivably be resurrected. 
"Just to be clear, the president of the United States, who's a plaintiff in this lawsuit, has not agreed in writing to delete the weaponization fund and there's no guarantee that he or one of the other plaintiffs" won't raise the issue in the future, Cornyn asked. 
Blanche replied that Trump has no power over the fund, which was to have been administered by the Justice Department but was never launched. 
Cornyn's questions were closely watched since Blanche requires the backing of all Republicans on the Judiciary Committee and the Texas senator has not committed his support. 
The hearing arrived at a tumultuous time for the Justice Department, with mass firings and resignations having hollowed out the workforce and Democrats and other critics raising alarms that Blanche is still functioning as Trump's personal lawyer. 
He has led the department on an interim basis since April, functioning as the public face of the maligned fund and accelerating investigations into perceived Trump adversaries. 
Even as he said the fund was shelved, he made clear that immunity from tax audits afforded to Trump this year remained in place despite a congressional outcry. 
Those actions, plus the flawed release of files from the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation, received fresh scrutiny Wednesday. 
"You're in charge of a Department of Justice I don't recognize, prosecuting the president's political enemies, firing rank and file prosecutors and FBI agents," Democratic Sen. 
Chris Coons of Delaware told Blanche. 
"These are some actions that in your previous confirmation hearing before us, you said you would not take." 
Blanche, for his part, pointed to investigations into Trump during the Biden administration to argue that he had inherited a politicized Justice Department. 
"In recent years, we watched the Justice Department turned against many of you and a former president, and it damaged the public's faith in justice," Blanche argued. 
"We are fixing that." 
Blanche will need the support of each Republican on the panel 
Key to Blanche's confirmation are Cornyn of Texas, who in May lost his primary, and Sen. 
Thom Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who has opted not to seek reelection. 
In the final stretches of their Senate career, both are seen as more likely than before to split from Trump and both have been outspoken critics of the fund the Trump administration created to compensate people who feel unjustly persecuted by the criminal justice system. 
After questioning Blanche, Cornyn told CNN he continues "to have some concerns" and is not "going to make any decisions at this point." 
Tillis, meanwhile, indicated during questioning that he is likely to support Blanche, even as he said he wanted "to stick a fork in this turkey of a 1776 fund." 
The death of South Carolina Republican Sen. 
Lindsey Graham, who was a member of the committee, left 11 Republicans and 10 Democrats on the panel. 
With Democrats united in solidarity against Blanche, =a no-vote by even a single Republican on the panel would scuttle Blanche's nomination. 
Blanche insists the fund is dead. 
Lawmakers aren't so sure 
The fund emerged from a settlement of Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over his leaked tax returns. 
Blanche had initially defended the initiative only to later reveal that it was being scrapped amid fierce bipartisan backlash. 
The judge handling the case said in a scathing ruling Monday that Trump had effectively engaged in self-dealing through the lawsuit. 
She said she was troubled Blanche had signed the settlement given his prior representation of Trump and was concerned the acting attorney general had given misleading testimony. 
Blanche said Wednesday that he disagreed "with the judge's insinuations about me." 
Blanche also defended a separate element of the settlement that afforded Trump and members of his family protection from tax audits and that, he has said, remains on track. 
He said the deal covers any existing audits but does not protect the president from examination of future tax filings. 
"Nobody is above the law," Blanche said. 
Such a settlement "doesn't make any of those individuals above the law." 
Epstein files are also under scrutiny 
Blanche was also pressed on the department's staggered release of the Epstein files, a process beset by problems, including redaction errors that left exposed nude photos showing the faces of potential victims. 
During a podcast interview with Joe Rogan released Wednesday, Vice President JD Vance said the administration "absolutely" mishandled the communications surrounding the files, including when then-Attorney General Pam Bondi distributed binders of Epstein documents at the White House to far-right influencers that contained already-public material. 
Blanche acknowledged that "mistakes were made" in the release process but nonetheless defended the work. 
"I want to make sure that the American people know that this administration, when it comes to Jeffrey Epstein, has been more transparent than any administration," he said. 
The Justice Department only released additional files after Trump bowed to bipartisan pressure to sign a law forcing the department to do so. 
A former federal prosecutor and key member of Trump's defense team as the Republican battled four indictments, Blanche arrived at the Justice Department last year as deputy attorney general. 
At one point, under friendly questioning from Republican Sen. 
John Kennedy about whether he and Trump are friends, Blanche responded: "I'm his lawyer," before quickly correcting himself to say he "was his lawyer." 
He ascended to the top job in April after Trump ousted Bondi, who had frustrated the White House by struggling to bring successful cases against Trump's political opponents. 
Blanche has tried to satisfy Trump in that regard, including with an indictment of ex-FBI Director James Comey, another Trump adversary, on charges of threatening the 47th president by posting a social media photograph of seashells in the numerical arrangement of "86 47." 
Comey has said the numbers were not a call to violence. 
Blanche was also asked about Jan. 6 violence 
Tillis, who has said he would not support for attorney general anyone who equivocates on the events of Jan. 6, 2021, when pro-Trump rioters stormed the U.S. 
Capitol, asked Blanche if he agreed that any Capitol Police officer assaulted that day was the "victim of a heinous crime." 
Blanche said he agreed. 
Democrats, meanwhile, pressed Blanche on the violence and Trump's sweeping clemency action benefiting more than 1,500 people, including those convicted of violently attacking police. 
Democratic Sen. 
Sheldon Whitehouse criticized Blanche for comments at a political conference this year where he appeared to characterize the Jan. 6 pardons as an administration accomplishment. 
Blanche replied that he has "never said that any sort of violence against law enforcement is appropriate." 
"He has the absolute right to pardon anybody for any reason he sees fit," Blanche said of the president. 
"I am not celebrating that. 
It is a fact." 
Associated Press writers Meg Kinnard and Michael Kunzelman contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Eric Tucker: 3.3%Associated Press: 2.2%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.4%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Eric Tucker: 2.4%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic3.7%This article: 3.6%Eric Tucker: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Eric Tucker: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias5.1%This article: 3.0%Eric Tucker: 8.4%Associated Press: 5.3%Framing Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%Eric Tucker: 0.3%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias2.6%This article: 4.2%Eric Tucker: 0.9%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 43.9%Eric Tucker: 11.8%Associated Press: 7.3%Negativity Bias43.9%This article: 9.8%Eric Tucker: 3.1%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias9.8%This article: 7.9%Eric Tucker: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error7.9%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Eric Tucker: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias1.7%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Eric Tucker: 0.6%Associated Press: 3.8%Halo Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Eric Tucker: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 2.1%Eric Tucker: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Eric Tucker: 1.6%Associated Press: 0.7%Ad Hominem3.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 1.7%Eric Tucker: 2.3%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority1.7%This article: 4.7%Eric Tucker: 1.2%Associated Press: 1.0%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.6%Eric Tucker: 3.2%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization3.6%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.8%Eric Tucker: 4.5%Associated Press: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion14.8%This article: 1.3%Eric Tucker: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question1.3%This article: 1.8%Eric Tucker: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.8%This article: 1.4%Eric Tucker: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque1.4%This article: 4.8%Eric Tucker: 0.9%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.8%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.7%Associated Press: 1.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.4%Eric Tucker: 2.0%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.8%Eric Tucker: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy1.8%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 3.1%Associated Press: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.1%Eric Tucker: 2.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 2.1%Eric Tucker: 6.9%Associated Press: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice2.1%This article: 4.4%Eric Tucker: 0.5%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 2.8%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Tucker: 0.3%Associated Press: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1247 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers40%attributed speech747writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 47 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageChris Coons of Delaware • 6 words • 0.0% coverageChris Coons of Delaware • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 27 words • 100.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 23 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 29 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 7 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 45 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageThom Tillis • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSheldon Whitehouse • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 5 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Blanche • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAssociated Press • 12 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

JD Vance

100%flagged-word coverage
45 attributed words9.0% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%JD Vance: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.5 ptsWriter: 3.5%JD Vance: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.