Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These SAL CHRIST results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 837 hits . Analysis detected 2,866 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,690 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,358 authors). This SAL CHRIST is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. SAL CHRIST
Author details
Total words: 3,690
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 22.7% 22.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst