Speaker summary
⁠32%2 analyzed articles/videos160.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Britney Spears results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 321 faulty-reasoning hits from 160.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (22,484 of 28,364 speakers). This Britney Spears is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Britney Spears
Speaker details
Total words: 160.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
14.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos160.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.2%25.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.6%11.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos