Speaker summary
⁠73%3 analyzed articles/videos189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Pfaff results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65.1% saturation with 152.623 hits. Analysis detected 583.84 faulty-reasoning hits from 189 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 27.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,914 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Pfaff is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group.
Brad Pfaff
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 189
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.9% percentile
27.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos189 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 65.1%65.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.1%34.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 34.2%34.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 45.6%45.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 65.1%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 45.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.1%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos