Publication summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Southernminn.com results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,557 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ā 93% (31 of 410 publications). This Southernminn.com is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 1,740
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.7% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.1% 9.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 11.0% 11.0% Attempt to Sell a Product⦠Sitewide 0.5% Publication 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 9.6% 9.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Publication 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst